SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, ELITE ATTITUDES, AND THE PUBLIC DEBATE OVER FOOD SAFETY
MANEY, ARDITH;PLUTZER, ERIC
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1996, pág. 42
1. Introduction. 2. Hypotheses. 3. Methods and Findings. 4. Assessments of Safety. 5. Additional safety assessments. 6. Recommendations for technology implementation. 7. The ideological basis of safety assessments. 8. Policymakers and the policy process. 9. Summary and discussion. 10 Implications.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY: WHAT DO EMPLOYEES WANT?
LINDENBER, KAREN E.;REESE, LAURA A.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1996, pág. 387
STATE EXPENDITURES AND POLICY OUTCOMES IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
BACOT, A. HUNTER;DAWES, ROY A.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1997, pág. 355
1. Theoretical framework and methodology. a) The dependent variable: Environmental effort (expenditures and rankings). b) The independent variables. c) Findings. 2. Discussion and conclusions. 3. Notes. 4. References. 5. Appendix sources and data in analysis.
STATE SUPPORT FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: A POLITICAL ECONOMY APPROACH
MORGAN, DAVID R.;KICKHAM, KENNETH;LAPLANT, JAMES T.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2001, pág. 359
1. Understanding a State's Commitment to highereducation. a) Supply. b) Demand. c) Higher educationexpenditure effort. 2. Variables and methods. 3. Findings.4. Conclusion.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS SYSTEMIC CHOICES
DANEKE, GREGORY A.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2001, pág. 514
1. Sustainable development: concept and conundrum.a) Picturing sustainability. b) Initiatives in search ofinstitutional arrangements. 2. Sustainability and strategicchoices. a) Towards an institutional ecology of ecologicalinstitutions. b) Toward a logic of systemic choice. c) Thecommons revisited. 3. The case of global climate. a) Theuncommon...
1. Sustainable development: concept and conundrum.a) Picturing sustainability. b) Initiatives in search ofinstitutional arrangements. 2. Sustainability and strategicchoices. a) Towards an institutional ecology of ecologicalinstitutions. b) Toward a logic of systemic choice. c) Thecommons revisited. 3. The case of global climate. a) Theuncommon commons. b) Expanding systemic choices. 4.Conclusions.
SYMPOSIUM: AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT
SWITZER, JAQUELINE VAUGHN;PERCY, STEPHEN L.;RIOUX, MARCIA H.;CRAWFORD, CAMERON
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/2001, pág. 629
1. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Ten years later. 2. Challenges and dilemmas in implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act: Lessons from the first decade. 3. Undue hardship and reasonable accomodation: The view from the court. 4. The Americans with Disabilities Act and reasonable accomodation: The view from persons with HIV/AIDS....
1. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Ten years later. 2. Challenges and dilemmas in implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act: Lessons from the first decade. 3. Undue hardship and reasonable accomodation: The view from the court. 4. The Americans with Disabilities Act and reasonable accomodation: The view from persons with HIV/AIDS. 5. Local government implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Factors affecting statutory compliance. 6. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Does it secure the fundamental right to vote?. 7. Transit access for the Americans: A proposal for the next stage of implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 8. The Americans with Disabilities Acts and medical providers: Ten years after the passage of the act. 9. The Americans with Disabilities Act as engine of social change: Models of disability and the potential of a civil rights approach.
VARIOS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/2000, pág. 331
1. Introduction to the Symposium on Homelessness.2. Conveying Mission Through Outcome Measurement: Servicesto the Homeless in New York City. 3. The Pursuit ofCoordination: The Organizational Dimension in the Responseto Homelessness. 4. Rooflessness in London. 5. Experts inTheir Own Lives: Emphasizing Client-Centeredness in aHomeless Program....
1. Introduction to the Symposium on Homelessness.2. Conveying Mission Through Outcome Measurement: Servicesto the Homeless in New York City. 3. The Pursuit ofCoordination: The Organizational Dimension in the Responseto Homelessness. 4. Rooflessness in London. 5. Experts inTheir Own Lives: Emphasizing Client-Centeredness in aHomeless Program. 6. Toward Self-Sufficiency: Evaluating aTransitional Housing Program for Homeless Families. 7.Methodologies for Examining Homelessness and TheirApplication to a Mandated Statewide Study.
VARIOS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2001, pág. 93
1. The Rural Environment: Uses and Abuses. 2. RuralOpportunities: Minimalist Policy and Community-BasedExperimentation. 3. Rural Failure: The Linkage BetweenPolicy and Lobbies. 4. Rural Elected Officials,Environmental Policy, and Economic Composition. 5.Influencing Environmental Policy in Rural Communities: TheEnvironmental Opposition at Work....
1. The Rural Environment: Uses and Abuses. 2. RuralOpportunities: Minimalist Policy and Community-BasedExperimentation. 3. Rural Failure: The Linkage BetweenPolicy and Lobbies. 4. Rural Elected Officials,Environmental Policy, and Economic Composition. 5.Influencing Environmental Policy in Rural Communities: TheEnvironmental Opposition at Work. 6. The Tension BetweenPolicy Science and Politics: Addressing Cancer Incidence andEnvironnmental Contamination in Michigan. 7. Health Care inRural Texas. 8. Locating Critical Components of RegionalHuman Capital.
SYMPOSIUM: UNCERTAINTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
BRESSERS, HANS TH.A.;ROSENBAUM, WALTER A.;THIELE, LESLIE PAUL;HAAS, PETER M.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2000, pág. 521
1. Innovation, Learnig, and Environmental Policy:Overcoming "A Plague of Uncertainties". 2. Limiting Risks:Environmental Ethics as a Policy Primer. 3. InternationalInstitutions and Social Learning in the Management of GlobalEnvironmental Risks. 4. Scientific Uncertainty and Learningin European Union Environmental Policymaking. 5.Institutional...
1. Innovation, Learnig, and Environmental Policy:Overcoming "A Plague of Uncertainties". 2. Limiting Risks:Environmental Ethics as a Policy Primer. 3. InternationalInstitutions and Social Learning in the Management of GlobalEnvironmental Risks. 4. Scientific Uncertainty and Learningin European Union Environmental Policymaking. 5.Institutional and Policy Responses to Uncertainty inEnvironmental Policy: A Comparison of Dutch and U.S. Styles.6. Strategic Environmental Planning and Uncertainty: ACross-National Comparison of Green Plans in IndustrializedCountries. 7. Uncertainty, Risk, Trust, and Information:Public Perceptions of Environmental Issues and Willingnessto Take Action. 8. Regulating Contested Local Hazards: IsConstructive Dialogue Possible Among Participants inCommunity Risk Management?. 9. Uncertainty as EnvironmentalEducation.
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT: HOW TECHNOLOGY INFLLUENCES OUTCOMES
KLEIN, HANS K.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/2000, pág. 313
1. Politics, Administration, and Technology. 2. TheSSC. 3. The Space Shuttle. 4. ITS. 5. Conclusions.
SATO, HAJINE
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1999, pág. 28
1. Analytical frameworks. 2. Progress in smokingcontrol through different models. 3. Discussion: Comparisonof two models. 4. Conclusion.
THE CHANGING FACE(S) OF IRELAND
CROTTY, WILLIAM;SCHMITT, DAVID E.;HARDIMAN, NIAMH
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/2000, pág. 779
1. The Changing Face(s) of Ireland. 2.Internationalization and Patterns of Political change inIreland. 3. Ireland: Economics and the Reinventing of aNation. 4. Taxing the Poor: The Politics of Income Taxationin Ireland. 5. Religious Identity and the Future of NorthermIreland. 6. The Ulster Unionist Party and the U.S. Role inthe Northern Ireland...
1. The Changing Face(s) of Ireland. 2.Internationalization and Patterns of Political change inIreland. 3. Ireland: Economics and the Reinventing of aNation. 4. Taxing the Poor: The Politics of Income Taxationin Ireland. 5. Religious Identity and the Future of NorthermIreland. 6. The Ulster Unionist Party and the U.S. Role inthe Northern Ireland Peace Process, 1994-2000.
THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTEES: TOWARD AN EXPLANATION OF VARIATION
RICCUCCI, NORMA M.;SAIDEL, JUDITH R.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2001, pág. 11
1. The Race and Gender Mix of Current GubernatorialAppointments. 2. Demographic Variation in GubernatorialAppointment Patterns. 3. Study Design. 4. Results. 5.Discussion. 6. Conclusion.
JONES JARDING, LILIAS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1999, pág. 217
1. Definition of the problem. 2. Native nations andpolitical science. 3. Methodology. 4. Results. 5.Discussion.
THE DIFFERING FACES OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY
JONES, BRADFORD S.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1995, pág. 540
1. The problem of global climate change. 2. Recent works on climate change policy. 3. Conclusion.
HARWOOD, STACY;MYERS, DOWELL
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2002, pág. 70
1. Growth and Change in Santa Ana. 2. Overcrowding and Land-Use Policy. 3. Neighborhood Protest and Community-Based Planning. 4. Lessons and Conclusions.
THE EFFECTS OF MAYORAL POWER ON URBAN FISCAL POLICY
MORGAN, DAVID R.;WATSON, SHEILAH S.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1995, pág. 231
1. The influence of mayoral power on urban budgetary decisions. 2. Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of mayoral power. 3. Data and measures. 4. Analysis and findings. 5. Conclusion.
THE ELECTORAL FOUNDATIONS OF JAPAN'S BANKING REGULATION
ROSENBLUTH, FRANCES;THIES, MICHAEL F.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2001, pág. 23
1. Financial Politics in Japan Before ElectoralReform. 2. The Political Response. 3. Interpreting the JusenDebacle. 4. Conclusion.
BLANKENAU, JOE
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2001, pág. 38
1. Merging Streams: The Canadian Experience. 2.Parallel Streams: The United States and National HealthInsurance. 3. Conclusion: Comparing the Streams.
NAPOLI, PHILIP M.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2001, pág. 372
1. Origins and scope of the Localism Principle incommunications Policymaking. 2. Early localism policies. 3.Local programming as point of origin. 4. Moving beyond thepoint of origin. 5. Discussion. a) Rationales for localismpolicies. b) Toward a two-tiered definition of localprogramming. 6. Conclusion.
THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN INTERDEPENDENCE
REUVENY, RAFAEL
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1999, pág. 643
1. Interdependence, conflict, and cooperation. 2. Amodel of Israeli-Palestinian interactions. 3.Israeli-Palestinian economic interdependence. 4. Violentcycles. 5. The logic of separation. 6. The policies ofseparation.7.
THE POLITICAL LEADERSHIP OF WOMEN AND PUBLIC POLICYMAKING
BURRELL, BARBARA
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1997, pág. 565
1. References.
THE POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION OF PRIVATIZATION: EFFORTS AMONG LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
DALEY, DENNIS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1996, pág. 629
1. Privatization and the Delivery of public services. 2. A passing fad it is not. 3. The antigovernment ideology. 4. The promise of productivity improvement. 5. Conclusion.
THE POLITICS OF CONNECTIVITY: THE ROLE OF BIG BUSINESS IN UK EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY
SELWYN, NEIL;FITZ, JOHN
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/2001, pág. 551
1. The NGfL as Public/Private Policy. 2. Questioning Public/Private Policymaking in Education. 3. Methods of Inquiry. 4. The Public/Private Origins of the NGfL. 5. The IT Industry and Its Participation in the Formation of the NGfL. 6. The Sustainability of Private Sector Involvement in the NGfL. 7. Discussion. 8. Conclusion.
THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK: PERCEPTIONS OF RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE STATE LEGISLATURES
COHEN, NEVIN
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1997, pág. 470
1. Growth in the use of risk assessment. 2. Risk as an arcane subject. 3. The survey. a) Survey instrument. b) Representativeness of responses. c) Statistical tests reported. 4. Results. a) Self-evaluation of risk assessment knowledge. b) Legislators desire basic environmental risk information. c) Riskiness of chemicals. d) Extrapolation from...
1. Growth in the use of risk assessment. 2. Risk as an arcane subject. 3. The survey. a) Survey instrument. b) Representativeness of responses. c) Statistical tests reported. 4. Results. a) Self-evaluation of risk assessment knowledge. b) Legislators desire basic environmental risk information. c) Riskiness of chemicals. d) Extrapolation from animal studies. e) Perceptions of dose-response. f) Effects of toxic chemical exposure. g) Attitudes toward use of risk assessment. h) Risk management decisions.