PUBLIC HEALTH-CARE PROVISION IN THE CANADIAN PROVINCES AND AMERICAN STATES
BOYCHUK, G.W.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2002, pág. 217
1. Rationale for comparisons. 2. National health-care systems in Canada and the United States. 3. Health care provision in American states and Canadian provinces. 4. Contributing to the debate.
PUBLIC SAFETY IN PRIVATE HANDS: A STUDY OF ONTARIO'S TECHNICAN STANDARDS AND SAFETY AUTHORITY
WINFIELD, MARK S.;WHORLEY, DAVID;KAUFMAN, SHELLEY BETH
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2002, pág. 24
1. The TSSA and new public management. 2. The TSSA: History, mandate and structure. 3. Review and assessment. 4. Conclusions.
ABELSON, DONALD E.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1999, pág. 240
1. Measuring public visibility. a) Think-tanks andthe media. 2. Assessing policy relevance. a) Governmentconsultations. b) Parliamentary testimony. 3. Interpretingthe results: comparing public visibility to policyrelevance. 4. Conclusion: next steps.
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN CANADA: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
VINING, A.R.; BOARDMAN, A.E.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2008, pág. 9 a 44
1. Government rationales for P3s. 2. A positive theory perspective: incorporating partners' objectives and transaction costs. 3. Private-sector objective function. 4. Public-sector objective function. 5. The drivers of transaction costs in P3s. 6. Canadian p3 case studies. a) Alberta Special Waste Management System. b) Confederation Bridge....
1. Government rationales for P3s. 2. A positive theory perspective: incorporating partners' objectives and transaction costs. 3. Private-sector objective function. 4. Public-sector objective function. 5. The drivers of transaction costs in P3s. 6. Canadian p3 case studies. a) Alberta Special Waste Management System. b) Confederation Bridge. c) Highway 407 Express Toll Route (ETR). d) Highway 104 Western Alignment Project. e) Evergreen Park School. f) O'Connell Drive Elementary School. g) Britannia Mine Water Treatment Plant. h) Moncton Water Treatment Facility. i) Cranbrook Civic Arena Multiplex. j) Waterloo Landfill Gas Power Plant. 7. Analysis of Canadian P3 case studies. 8. Conclusion.
PUBLIC-SERVICE AWARDS PROGRAMS: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS
BORINS, SANDFORD
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2000, pág. 321
1. A typology of awards. 2. Explaining theproliferation of awards. 3. Benefit-cost analysis of awards.4. Managing awards more effectively. 5. Conclusion.
PUBLIC-SERVICE VALUES AND ETHICS: DEAD END OR STRONG FOUNDATION?
HEINTZMAN, R.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 4/2007, pág. 573 a 602
I. A MISTAKEN PREMISE. II. RULES VERSUS VALUES?. III. VALUES, CONSEQUENCES AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST. IV. FACTS, RULES AND VALUES. V. DECISION-MAKING IN THE REAL WORLD. VI. VALUES, ETHICS AND CULTURE. VII. SPECIFIC ARGUMENTS. 1. THE IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES. 2. TOO MANY VALUES?. 3. VALUE-SHOPPING AND CONFLICT. 4. THE PLASTICITY OF SPECIFIC...
I. A MISTAKEN PREMISE. II. RULES VERSUS VALUES?. III. VALUES, CONSEQUENCES AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST. IV. FACTS, RULES AND VALUES. V. DECISION-MAKING IN THE REAL WORLD. VI. VALUES, ETHICS AND CULTURE. VII. SPECIFIC ARGUMENTS. 1. THE IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES. 2. TOO MANY VALUES?. 3. VALUE-SHOPPING AND CONFLICT. 4. THE PLASTICITY OF SPECIFIC VALUES. 5. ETHICAL VERSUS OTHER VALUES. VIII. THE QUESTION OF EVIDENCE. IX. WHAT IS USEFUL IN LANGFORD'S ARGUMENT. X. INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACHES. XI. A STRONG FOUNDATION.
PAQUET, RENAUD; GOSSELIN, ERIC
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2006, pág. 125
1. LA PROBLÉMATIQUE SPÉCIFIQUE. 2. LES ATTITUDES AU TRAVAIL ET LES ÉTAPES DE CARRIÈRE. 3. LA MÉTHODOLOGIE DE RECHERCHE ET LA MESURE DES CONCEPTS. 4. RÉSULTATS. 5. DISCUSSION ET CONCLUSION.
PAQUIN, STÉPHANE
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 4/2005, pág. 477 a 505
1. LES MÉCANISMES DE LA POLITIQUE ÉTRANGÈRE ET LES RELATIONS FÉDÉRALES-PROVINCIALES AU CANADA. 2. LES ARGUMENTS POUR UNE RÉFORME. 3. LES EXPÉRIENCES ÉTRANGÈRES. 4. ANALYSE DES MODÈLES À LA LUMIÈRE DE LA DYNAMIQUE DU FÉDÉRALISME CANADIEN. 5. CONCLUSION.
RE-THINKING LOCAL AUTONOMY: PERCEPTIONS FROM FOUR RURAL MUNICIPALITIES
JACOB, BENOY; LIPTON, BECKY; HAGENS, VICTORIA; REIMER, BILL
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2008, pág. 407 a 427
1. Autonomy in Canadian municipal reform. 2. Towards a framework of autonomy and capacity. 3. Methodology. 4. Description of the case studies. 5. Findings. 6. Conclusion.
RECOGNIZING SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: THE EVOLUTION OF RECENT FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL POLICIES
SMITH, MIRIAM
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2002, pág. 1
1. The pre-Charter era. 2. The post-Charter area. 3. Key cases in the area of relationship recognition. 4. Early Charter cases. 4. From non-discrimination to relationship recognition. 5. Same-sex marriages. 6. Provincial responses: Ontario, Alberta, B.C. and Quebec. 7. Federal policy. 8. Conclusions.
TURGEON, JEAN;SABOURIN, PATRICK
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1996, pág. 192
1. Regroupements interétablissements: un modèle intégrateur. 2. Orientations apportées par la Loi sur les services de santé et les services sociaux et par la Politique de la santé et du bien-êntre. 3. La situation récente. 4. Discussion générale. 5. Conclusion.
REDUCING COSTS BY CONSOLIDATING MUNICIPALITIES: NEW BRUNSWICK, NOVA SCOTIA AND ONTARIO
SANCTON, ANDREW
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1996, pág. 267
1. Cost-savings as a motive for Canadian municipal consolidation. 2. Scale and cost in the U.K. and the U.S. 3. New Brunswick. 4. Nova Scotia. 5. Ontario. 6. Conclusion.
REFORMING LABOUR-MARKET POLICY GOVERNANCE: THE QUEBEC EXPERIENCE
HADDOW, R.;PERELLI, OSCAR;DE JUAN, MARTA
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1998, pág. 343
1. What has changed in Quebec?. 2. Explaining relative success: a distinct political economy?. a) An auspicious setting. b) Societal actors. c) State actors. 3.What are the obstacles to reform in Quebec?. a) Constraining parameters. b) Societal actors. c) State actors. 4. When is it possible to reform labourmarket governance?.
WILLIAMS, ROBERT J.;DOWNEY, TERRENCE J.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1999, pág. 160
1. A note on research. 2. Reforming countygovernment. a) The regional government/county restructuringera. b) The "ideal county" era. c) The "common sense" era.3. Selection of cases and approach. 4. County of Victoria.a) Regional government/county restructuring era. b) The"ideal county" era. c) The "common...
1. A note on research. 2. Reforming countygovernment. a) The regional government/county restructuringera. b) The "ideal county" era. c) The "common sense" era.3. Selection of cases and approach. 4. County of Victoria.a) Regional government/county restructuring era. b) The"ideal county" era. c) The "common sense" era. 5. County ofDufferin. a) Regional government/county restructuring era.b) The "ideal county" era. c) The "common sense" era. 6.County of Wellington. a) Regional government/countyrestructuring era. b) The "ideal county" era. c) The "commonsense" era. 7. County of Perth. a) regionalgovernment/county restructuring era. b) The "ideal county"era. c) The "common sense" era. 8. Conclusion.
HARTLEY, SARAH; SKOGSTAD, GRACE
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2005, pág. 305 a 327
-1. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY RISK REGULATION IN CANADA. A. INSTITUTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. B. FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES. -2 PLANT BIOTECNOLOGY RISK REGULATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. A. INSTITUTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. B. FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES. C. PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY. -3. MODELS OF...
-1. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY RISK REGULATION IN CANADA. A. INSTITUTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. B. FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES. -2 PLANT BIOTECNOLOGY RISK REGULATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. A. INSTITUTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. B. FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES. C. PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY. -3. MODELS OF DEMOCRACY AND BIOTECHNOLOGHY REGULATION: COMPARING CANADA AND THE U.K. -4. CONCLUSION.
REGULATION ON THE RUN: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE CRTC AS A REGULATORY INSTITUTION
DOERN, G. BRUCE
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1997, pág. 516
1.The CRTC and its mandate in brief historical context. 2. The independence issue and representation. 3. The quasi-judicial and adjudicative functions and the mix of functions. 4. Regulatory compliance, enforcement and service delivery. 5. Famework competition versus sectoral regulators. 6. The internationalization of regulation and the CRTC....
1.The CRTC and its mandate in brief historical context. 2. The independence issue and representation. 3. The quasi-judicial and adjudicative functions and the mix of functions. 4. Regulatory compliance, enforcement and service delivery. 5. Famework competition versus sectoral regulators. 6. The internationalization of regulation and the CRTC. 7. Conclusions.
GINDENGIL, ELISABETH;VENGROFF, RICHARD
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1997, pág. 457
1. Data. 2. Findings. 3. Summary and conclusions.
ROBERTS, ALASDAIR
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 4/1999, pág. 422
1. Ontario: tightening gateway provisions. 2.Federal law: cutbacks and weakened enforcement. 3. BritishColumbia: limited data on impact of policy changes. 4.Reforms to improve FOI laws. 5. Conclusion.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND THE CONUNDRUM OF SCIENCE-POLICY RELATIONS
BRIGGS, C.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2002, pág. 258
SEARCHING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN A GOVERNMENT WITHOUT BOUNDARIES
SAVOIE, D.J.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2004, pág. 1
1. ESTABLISHING ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES. 2. DEPUTY MINISTERS. 3. REMOVING BOUNDARIES. 4. THINK-TANKS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES. 5. CONSULTANTS AND LOBBYISTS. 6. E-GOVERNMENT. 7. LOOKING TO BUSINESS. 8. ACCESS TO INFORMATION. 9. THE NEW DEPUTY MINISTER. 10. A FAULT LINE. 11. SEARCHING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY.
SHIFTING THE BURDEN: HOW MUCH CAN GOVERNMENT DOWNLOAD TO THE NON-PROFIT SECTOR?
HALL, MICHAEL H.;REED, PAUL B.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/1998, pág. 1
1. Factors in assessing the prospects for downloading. a) The size and composition of the non-profit sector in Canada. b) The character of non-profit sector. c) Differences between government and nonprofit organizations. d) Additional considerations. 2. Theoretical perspectives on the role of non-profits in the delivery of social programs....
1. Factors in assessing the prospects for downloading. a) The size and composition of the non-profit sector in Canada. b) The character of non-profit sector. c) Differences between government and nonprofit organizations. d) Additional considerations. 2. Theoretical perspectives on the role of non-profits in the delivery of social programs. 3. Implications of government downloading of social services. a) Terminationg programs while maintaining non-profit funding.
SHORTER MEASURES: THE CHANGING MINISTERIAL CAREER IN CANADA
WHITE, GRAHAM;SEVILLA, GLADYS
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1998, pág. 369
1. Context of changes in ministerial careers. 2. Pre-cabinet legislative experience. 3. Age. 4. Tenure in office. 5. Tenure in individual portfolios. 6. Range of ministerial experience. 7. Leaving cabinet. 8. Conclusion.
SOLID-WASTE CONTRACTING-OUT, COMPETITION, AND BIDDING PRACTICES AMONG CANADIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MCDAVID, J.C.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2001, pág. 1
1. Hypotheses and existing research. 2. The study.3. Findings. 4. Conclusions.
NELLES, JEN; ALCANTARA, CHRISTOPHER
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2011, pág. 315 a 334
1. Background considerations. 2. Types of partnerships. 3. Evaluating the intensity of First Nations-local/regional relationships. 4. Results and observations. 5. Conclusion.
CONTANDRIOPOULOS, D.; HUDON, R.; MARTIN, E.; THOMPSON, D.
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2007, pág. 219 a 243
1. MISE EN CONTEXTE: LA LOI 25. 2. DONNÉES ET CADRE CONCEPTUEL. 3. MODÈLE COMMUNICATIONNEL. 4. CANAUX ET ACTEURS DE LA COMMUNICATION. 5. PRÉSENTATION DES CAS. 6. DISCUSSION. 7. NATURE ET STATUT DES ACTEURS. 8. CONTENU ET FORME DES COMMUNICATIONS. 9. PRAGMATISME ET SENSIBILITÉ POLITIQUE. 10. CONCLUSION.