Síguenos en los medios sociales
THIRD-PARTY POLICING AND INSURANCE: THE CASE OF MARKET-BASED CRIME PREVENTION
ROACH ANLEU, SHARIN L.;GREEN MAZEROLLE, LORRAINE;PRESSER, LOIS
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/2000, pág. 67
1. Introduction. 2. Recent trends in policing. 3.Market-based third-party policing: the insurance example. 4.Private and public third-party policing: a theoreticalcomparison. 5. Insurance and the community: an inconsistentlogic?. 6. Summary and conclusion.
THREE STRIKES LEGISLATION AND SENTENCING COMMISSION OBJECTIVES
WRIGHT, RONALD F.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/1998, pág. 429
1. Introduction. 2. Institutional pathologies in sentencing. a) Judicial pathologies. b) Executive pathologies. c) Legislative pathologies. 3. Three strikes legislation and sentencing pathologies. a) Commission states. b) Three strikes jurisdictions. c) Potential commission strategies in the face of three strikes proposals. 4. Commission priorities...
1. Introduction. 2. Institutional pathologies in sentencing. a) Judicial pathologies. b) Executive pathologies. c) Legislative pathologies. 3. Three strikes legislation and sentencing pathologies. a) Commission states. b) Three strikes jurisdictions. c) Potential commission strategies in the face of three strikes proposals. 4. Commission priorities in limiting the scope of three strikes legislation. a) Blocking passage. b) Scope limits. 5. Conclusion. 6. Notes. 7. References.
TJHE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF STATE SUCCESS IN FEDERALISM LITIGATION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT.
CHEN, PAUL
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/2003, pág. 455 a 472
1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CHANGING STATUS OF THE STATES IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM 3. INCREASING LITIGATION CAPACITY OF STATEATTORNEYS GENERAL: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND DELIBERATE EFFORTS 4. A PRO-STATE AGENDA BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT 5. CONCLUSION
TOO MUCH, TOO LATE: THE ADVOCACY ACT IN ONTARIO
LIGHTMAN, ERNIE S.;AVIRAM, URI
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/2000, pág. 25
1. Introduction. 2. Social advocacy in ontario. 3.The advocacy act. 4. The government's dilemmas: too much. 5.The governments dilemmas: too late. 6. The psychiatricpatients' advocacy office (PPAO). 7. The demise of theadvocacy commission. 8. Discussion: what went wrong?. 9.Conclusion.
WARRANTED AND UNWARRANTED COMPLEXITY IN U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
RUBACK, R. BARRY
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/1998, pág. 357
1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Establishing the sentencing guidelines. 4. Initial decisions that made the sentencing guidelines complex. 5. Pressures that led and continue to lead to greater complexity. 6. The effects of complexity. 7. Assessing the complexity of the guidelines. 8. Dealing with complexity. 9. Conclusion.
JODY, RAPHAEL
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/1997, pág. 123
1. Introduction. 2. Four major research studies. 3. Comparative prevalence of domestic violence across the studies. 4. Future research areas. 5. Policy implications. 6. Conclusion.
