FUZZY LEGALITY IN REGULATION: THE LEGISLATIVE MANDATE REVISITED
COHN, MARGIT
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/2001, pág. 469
1. Introduction. 2. Preliminary concepts. a) The legislative mandate. b) Fuzzy legality. 3. "Fuzzy legality": Six departures from the legislative mandate ideal-type. a) Type 1 fuzziness: "Absence" of law. b) Type 2 fuzziness: Sweeping delegation. c) Type 3 fuzziness: Lopsided mandate - legislation as power-enhancement....
1. Introduction. 2. Preliminary concepts. a) The legislative mandate. b) Fuzzy legality. 3. "Fuzzy legality": Six departures from the legislative mandate ideal-type. a) Type 1 fuzziness: "Absence" of law. b) Type 2 fuzziness: Sweeping delegation. c) Type 3 fuzziness: Lopsided mandate - legislation as power-enhancement. d) Type 4 fuzziness: Selective enforcement. e) Type 5 fuzziness: Extra-statutory arrangements. f) Type 6 fuzziness: Pastiche law. 4. Assessing fuzzy legality. a) The choice of fuzzy legality: A view from within. b) Extraneous influencing factors: constraints and opportunities. c) The role of legislative mandate: The normative dimension. 5. Conclusion.
GAMES OF ENGAGEMENT: POSTURES WITHIN THE REGULATORY COMMUNITY
BRAITHWAITE, VALERIE
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/1995, pág. 225
1.Introduction. 2. The social rift model. a) Understanding postures as social bonds. b) Understanding postures as modes of adaptation. 3. The purpose of this study. a) The data base. b) The outcome variables. c) Measuring commitment to goals and means. d) Measuring social bonds. e) Control variables. 4. Data analysis. a) Predicting resistance....
1.Introduction. 2. The social rift model. a) Understanding postures as social bonds. b) Understanding postures as modes of adaptation. 3. The purpose of this study. a) The data base. b) The outcome variables. c) Measuring commitment to goals and means. d) Measuring social bonds. e) Control variables. 4. Data analysis. a) Predicting resistance. b) Predicting disengagement...
GEOPOLITICS AND THE REGULATION OF ECONOMIC LIFE
DODD, NIGEL;HUTTER, BRIDGET
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/2000, pág. 1
1. Introduction. 2. Defining globalization. 3. Theregulatory process. 4. The role of the nation-state. 5.Defining the national interest. 6. Research inmplications.7. The definition of a problem. 8. The decision tocooperate. 9. Examples and deviations. 10. Specifyingresearch questions. 11. Conclusion.
HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT AS LAW IN ACTION
ROSS, H. LAURENCE
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/1995, pág. 133
1. Introduction. 2. The context. 3. The organization of code inspection. 4. Methods. 5. The inspection task. 6. The inspector's quandary. 7. Extruding complaints. 8. Prioritizing violations. 9. The role of trust. 10. Negotiating compliance. 11. "Progress". 12. "Substantial compliance". 13. The failure of negotiation....
1. Introduction. 2. The context. 3. The organization of code inspection. 4. Methods. 5. The inspection task. 6. The inspector's quandary. 7. Extruding complaints. 8. Prioritizing violations. 9. The role of trust. 10. Negotiating compliance. 11. "Progress". 12. "Substantial compliance". 13. The failure of negotiation. 14. Housing code enforcement as law in action. 15. Simplification, liberalization, and arbitrariness ...
IMPLEMENTATION BETWEEN TRADITION AND MANAGEMENT: STRUCTURATION AND STYLES OF IMPLEMENTATION
TERPSTRA, JAN;HAVINGA, TETTY
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/2001, pág. 95
1. Introduction. 2. Structuration of policyimplementation: institutional context and implementationpractice. 3. Four styles of implementation. 4. Three stylesin public assistance: an example. 5. Implementation stylesand the welfare state in transition. 6. Conclusion.
SHANE-DUBOW, SANDRA
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/1998, pág. 231
1. Structured sentencing. 2. Unitended consequences and complexity. 3. Shifting rationale for reform. 4. Five structured sentencing systems. 5. The next decade.
INTRODUCTION: COMPARING NATIONAL STYLES OF REGULATION IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES
KAGAN, ROBERT A.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/2000, pág. 225
1. Introduction. 2. Comparing regulatory systems:policy versus process. 3. Probing the conventional images ofnational styles of regulation. 4. Some consequences ofcontrasting styles of regulation. 5. Conclusion.
INTRODUCTION: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, LAW AND POLICY
MACHURA, STEFAN
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/1998, pág. 1
1. The four studies presented. 2. About procedures. 3. About fair procedures. 4. Theories of justice. 5. Some political implications.
INTRODUCTION: THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBAL LEGISLATION
ALFRED C. AMAN, JR.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/1993, pág. 1
1. The Montreal Protocol: Two negotiating phasesìand three perspectives. a) Science. b) Economics. c) Equity.ìd) The global regulatory dialogue. 2. Montreal and Rio. 3.ìConclusion.
LAW, POLITICS, AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: A CASE STUDY OF PALESTINIANS IN ISRAEL
SHALHOUB-KEVORKIAN, NADERA
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/1999, pág. 189
1. Introduction. 2. Literature review. 3.Palestinian-arab society in Israel. 4. The study. 5.Findings a) Social and cultural variables. b) Politicizationof the law. 6. Conclusion.
LEGAL AMBIGUITY AND THE POLITICS OF COMPLIANCE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICERS' DILEMMA
EDELMAN, LAURENT B;PETTERSON, STEPHEN;CHAMBLISS, ELIZABETH;ERLANGER, HOWARD S.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/1991, pág. 73
1. Introduction: organizational compliance asìprocess. 2. EEO/AA Law and its implementation by affirmativeìaction officers. 3. Data and methods. 4. Officers' responsesìto structural contradictions. 5.Discussion and implications.
LEGAL REGULATION AND COMMUNICATIVE COUPLINGS
BORN, ASMUND W.;GOLDSCHMIDT, LARS B.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/1997, pág. 23
1.Introduction. 2. Systems theory. 3. Researchmethods. 4. Risk case: categories and regulation. 5. Riskcase: developing a discourse. 6. Risk case: discursiveclosure and risk. 7. Law, coupling, and democracy. 8.Afterthought.
LET SPECIFICITY, CLARITY, AND PARSIMONY OF PURPOSE BE OUR GUIDE
SMITH, MICHAEL E.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/1998, pág. 491
1. Introduction: what does the rule of law require?. a) What has been lost in the construction of presumptive grid guidelines?. b) What is gained by a rule of law requiring the court to reason from purpose to sentence, by inferences form the facts and circumstances of each case?. 2. The importance of specificity, clarity, and parsimony of...
1. Introduction: what does the rule of law require?. a) What has been lost in the construction of presumptive grid guidelines?. b) What is gained by a rule of law requiring the court to reason from purpose to sentence, by inferences form the facts and circumstances of each case?. 2. The importance of specificity, clarity, and parsimony of penal purpose and strategy in noncustodial sentencing. a) Why is specificity of penal purpose and strategy important?. b) Why is clarity important?. c) Why is parsimony important?. 3. How clarity and specificity of penal purpose and strategy make individual characteristics and circumstances relevant. a) Homelessness. b) Poverty. c) Family responsibilities and circumstances. d) Employment. 4. Some specifics on managing the risk of failure. 5. Conclusion. 6. Notes. 7. References.
LIKE SHIPS THAT PASS IN THE NIGHT: AFDC POLICY AND BATTERED WOMEN
LENNETT, JUDITH
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/1997, pág. 183
1. Introduction. 2. Policies in conflict. 3. Toward an informed AFDC policy. 4. Conclusion.
MAKING SENSE OUT OF REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT.
MAY, PETER J.;BURBY, RAYMOND J.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/1998, pág. 157
1. Making sense out of regulatory enforcement. 2. Reconsidering basic concepts. a) Sorting out levels: Agencies and inspectors. b) Confusing concepts and dimensions. c) Our approach to conceptualization. 3. Data and methods. 4. Enforcement philosophy. 5. Analyzing variation in enforcement philosophy. 6. Enforcement strategies. 7. Conclusions....
1. Making sense out of regulatory enforcement. 2. Reconsidering basic concepts. a) Sorting out levels: Agencies and inspectors. b) Confusing concepts and dimensions. c) Our approach to conceptualization. 3. Data and methods. 4. Enforcement philosophy. 5. Analyzing variation in enforcement philosophy. 6. Enforcement strategies. 7. Conclusions. 8. Notes.
MANAGING THE HIV/AIDS PANDEMIC: PAVING A PATH INTO THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ORGANIZATION
MAMELI, PETER A.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/2000, pág. 203
1. Introduction. 2. International actors, publicinternational law, and United Nations reform. 3. TheHIV/AIDS pandemic. 4. From quasi-legislation to convention?.5. Conclusion.
MEDICAL ERROR AND PATIENT SAFETY: UNDERSTANDING CULTURES IN CONFLICT
WEINBERG, JOANNA K.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 2/2002, pág. 93
I. Introduction. II. International perspectives on patient safety. III. The culture of decision making. IV. The culture of quality measurement: walking on quicksand. V. The need for systematic (and systemic) regulation. VI. Conclusion.
META RISK MANAGEMENT AND RESPOSIBE REGULARION FOR TAX SYSTEM INTEGRITY.
JOHN BRAITHWAITE
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/2003, pág. 1 a 16
I. THE RISK PARADIGM IN COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION. II.THE DEVELOPING PRACTICE OF META RISK MANAGEMENT. III. THE REGISTERED SOFTWARE PROJECT. IV. THE TRANSFER PRICING RECORD REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. V.CONCLUSION.
MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES: A STRUCTURE FOR CHANGE
DAILEY, DEBRA L.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/1998, pág. 311
1. Overview of sentencing reform. 2. Changes in compliance with the guidelines. 3. Maintaining rational sentencing policy. 4. Conclusion.
MODELING DISCRETION IN AMERICAN SENTENCING SYSTEMS
REITZ, KEVIN R.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/1998, pág. 389
1. Introduction. 2. Discretion theory for sentencing systems. a) Definitions. b) Diagrams. c) Five hypotheses. 3. Modeling sentencing discretion in three guideline jurisdictions. a) The federal system. b) Pennsylvania. c) Minnesota. 4. Conclusion. 5. Notes. 6. References.
AALDERS, MARIUS;WILTHAGEN, TON
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/1997, pág. 415
1. Introduction. 2. Regulation and self-regulation in two arenas. a) The work environment. b) The external environment. 3. Reflexivity as a new paradigm. a) The concept of reflexivity. 4. Reflexive strategies. a) Systems monitoring. b) Intermediary structures and networks. c) Corporate social responsibility. d) Market-oriented strategies....
1. Introduction. 2. Regulation and self-regulation in two arenas. a) The work environment. b) The external environment. 3. Reflexivity as a new paradigm. a) The concept of reflexivity. 4. Reflexive strategies. a) Systems monitoring. b) Intermediary structures and networks. c) Corporate social responsibility. d) Market-oriented strategies. 5. Conclusion.
WOKUTCH, RICHARD E.;VANSANDT, CRAIG V.
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/2000, pág. 369
1. Introduction. 2. Background to this research. 3.Injury and illness statistics. 4. The japanese safety andhealth system. 5. What the U.S. and Japan can learn fromeach other. 6. Conclusion.
NEGOTIATION, POWER IN CONCILIATION, AND REVIEW OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS
GUTHRIE, ROBERT
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 3/2002, pág. 229
I. Introduction. II. Conciliation officers. III. Review officers. IV. Compensation magistrates. V. The Supreme Court. VI. "Repeat players" and "one-shotters" in workers compensation disputes. VII. Power in compensation claims. VIII. The exercize of power by workers. IX. Personal power, literacy and cultural diversity....
I. Introduction. II. Conciliation officers. III. Review officers. IV. Compensation magistrates. V. The Supreme Court. VI. "Repeat players" and "one-shotters" in workers compensation disputes. VII. Power in compensation claims. VIII. The exercize of power by workers. IX. Personal power, literacy and cultural diversity. X. Stress claims. XI. Gender. XII. The exercise of power by employers and insurers. XIII. The exercise of power by conciliation and review officers. XIV. Lawyers and the exercise of power. XV. The effect of power imbalances in compensation disputes. XVI. Observations. XVII. Conclusions.
BLACK, JULIA
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 1/1997, pág. 51
1. Introduction. 2. The new institutionalims: anoutline. 3. New institutionalisms and decision making. 4.Institutionalism and naturalism. 5. Institutionalism, legaldecision making and regulatory processes. 6.Institutionalisms, socio-legal analysis and the legalparadigm.
VAN BUEREN, GERALDINE
LAW AND POLICY, n.º 4/1995, pág. 377
1. Introduction. 2. Four dilemmas. 3. Torture: The public and the private spheres. 4. International and regional jurisprudence. 5. Conclusion.