A POLITICAL EXPLANATION OF POLICY SELECTION: THE CASE OF URBAN SCHOOL REFORM
HESS, FREDERICK M.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1999, pág. 459
1. Previous Reserch. 2. Methodology. 3. A politicalexplanation of reform selection. 4. The policy areas:Comparing SBM and Scheduling reforms. 5. Testing a Politicaltheory of policy selection. 6. Conclusion.
A VIEW OF THEIR OWN: WOMEN'S COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP STYLES AND STATE LEGISLATURES.
SIMON ROSENTHAL, CINDY
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1997, pág. 585
1. Gender and legislatures. 2. Methods and data. 3. The profile of committee chairs. a) The sample as a whole. b) Sex differences by legislature. 4. Measures of committee leadership style. a) Leadership motivation. b) Inclusive behaviors. 5. Results of categorical analysis. 6. Multivariate analysis.
A WEB OF INTERESTS: STALEMATE ON THE DISPOSAL OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL
KATZ, JONATHAN L.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2001, pág. 456
1. Literature of institutions, interests, and SNFdisposal policy. a) Literature on environmental policy,nuclear politics, and SNF disposal. 2. Stalemate over SNFdisposal. a) What is policy stalemate?. b) The U.S. path tostalemate. 3. Explaining the stalemate. a) The nature of theproblem. b) Explaining the stalemate: the response of thepluralist...
1. Literature of institutions, interests, and SNFdisposal policy. a) Literature on environmental policy,nuclear politics, and SNF disposal. 2. Stalemate over SNFdisposal. a) What is policy stalemate?. b) The U.S. path tostalemate. 3. Explaining the stalemate. a) The nature of theproblem. b) Explaining the stalemate: the response of thepluralist american political system. c) Officialpolicymakers have few incentives to act. d) Interest groups:many, but no majority. e) The latent trade-off betweenenergy and environment. 4. Resolving the stalemate. 5.Conclusion.
WEBER, EDWARD P.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1998, pág. 185
1. The politics of garbage in spokane, Washington. 2. Cooperative intergovernmental policy as an enduring feature of the political landscape. 3. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
ABOLITION OF LEPROSY ISOLATION POLICY IN JAPAN: POLICY TERMINATION THROUGH LEADERSHIP
SATO, HAJIME
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2002, pág. 29
1. Leprosy Control Policy in Japan. 2. Discussion. 3. Conclusions.
ADVOCACY COALITIONS, POLICY ENTREPRENEURS, AND POLICY CHANGE
MINTROM, MICHAEL;VERGARI, SANDRA
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1996, pág. 420
1. Introduction. 2. Two models of policymaking. 3. Comparing the models. 4. Explaining education reform in Michigan. 5. Assessing the merits of each interpretation. 6. Conclusion.
AIRPORT PRIVATIZATION: FULL DIVESTITURE AND ITS ALTERNATIVES
TRUITT, LAWRENCE J.;ESLER, MICHAEL
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1996, pág. 100
1. The divestitur. 2. Alternative models. 3. Conclusion.
LOWRY, ROBERT C.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1998, pág. 748
1. The demand side: Interest group pluralism andfractured advocacy. 2. The supply side: Public participationin local siting and cleanup decisions. 3. Discussion.
AMERICAN AND CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERALISM: A GAME-THEORETIC ANLYSIS
MARTIN GILLROY, JOHN
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1999, pág. 360
1. The prisoner's dilemma and "centralized"federalism in the United States. 2. Chicken and "privileged"federalism in Canada. 3. Environmental federalism: Thefindings of five case studies. 4. Conclusions.
BRYNER, GARY
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1999, pág. 307
1. The evolution of U.S. forest policy. 2. Anoverview of BC forest policy. 3. Explaining U.S. andCanadian forest policies. 4. Assessing U.S. and Canadiantimber policy. 5. Reversing policy failures.
BALANCING THE FEDERAL BUDGET: A FANTASY?
WARD, SCOTT D.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1995, pág. 155
1. Reconciliation and the 302 Process. 2. Strategic budgeting. 3. A budgert controller. 4. Reforming the budget process.
BEYOND EMPIRICISM: POLICY INQUIRY IN POSTPOSITIVIST PERSPECTIVE.
FISCHER, FRANK
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1998, pág. 129
1. Mainstream policy analysis: The epistemological problem. 2. Postpositivism: The critique of empiricism. 3. Postpositivism: From proof to interpretation. 4. Practical reason as reasoning-context. 5. Policy-analytic implications: The empirical in normative context. 6. Toward a policy science of democracy: Institutions and practices. 7. Conclusion....
1. Mainstream policy analysis: The epistemological problem. 2. Postpositivism: The critique of empiricism. 3. Postpositivism: From proof to interpretation. 4. Practical reason as reasoning-context. 5. Policy-analytic implications: The empirical in normative context. 6. Toward a policy science of democracy: Institutions and practices. 7. Conclusion. 8. Notes.
BEYOND NIMBY: EXPLAINING OPPOSITION TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES
HUNTER, SUSAN;LEYDEN, KEVIN M.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1995, pág. 601
1. Introduction. 2. Previous Studies on Opposition to Siting. 3. The Data. 4. An Examination of Public Concern toward the Siting of a Hazardous Waste Incinerator. 5. Explaining Opposition to Siting: A Multivariate Model. 6. Analysis and Discussion. 7. Implications and Conclusion.
BIG CITY LABOR MARKETS AND IMMIGRANT ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
JAMES, FRANKLIN J.;ROMINE, JEFF;RESNICK TERRY, PHYLLIS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/2002, pág. 107
1. Geographic Patterns of Immigrant Population Growth. 2. The Characteristics of Immigrant Labor Markets in Big Cities. 3. The Determinants of the Wages of Immigrants. 4. Findings. 5. Conclusions.
BRIDGING POSITIVIST AND INTERPRETIVIST APPROACHES TO QUALITATIVE METHODS.
CHIH LIN, ANN
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1998, pág. 162
1. Of relationships and mechanisms. 2. Assessing validity. 3. Research in conversation. 4. Notes.
DODSON, DEBRA L.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 4/1997, pág. 569
1. The literature. 2. The data. 3. The analysis. a) Gender differences in officeholders' private responsibilities. b) Consequences of gender differences in the compatibility of public and private. 4. Conclusion. 5. Notes. 6. References.
MAZUR, AMY G.;PARRY, JANINE
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1998, pág. 384
1. RNGS: Constituting and managing a multination, multimember study. 2. Applying comparative politics solutions in the RNGS Research design. 3. Conclusion.
GREENE, JEFFREY D.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1996, pág. 135
1. Introduction. 2. An overview of previous empirical research. 3. Explaining differences in privatization levels. 4. Data and methods. 5. Findings. 6. Central and suburban cities compared. 7. Implications. 8. Conclusion.
MATTHEWS, MARY M.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/2001, pág. 478
1. Literature review. 2. Institutionalarrangements. 3. Findings. 4. Conclusions.
COMMENTS ON ANDERSON, GOVERNMENTAL SUASION: ADDING TO THE LOWI POLICY TYPOLOGY
LOWI, THEODORE J.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1997, pág. 283
COMMITTEE INFLUENCE OVER CONTROVERSIAL POLICY: THE REPRODUCTIVE POLICY CASE
NORTON, NOELLE H.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1999, pág. 203
1. The reproductive policy example. 2. Studyingreproductive policymaking in Congress. 3. Conclusions.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF CANADIAN AND AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM
RABE, BARRY G.;LOWRY, WILLIAM R.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 2/1999, pág. 263
1. Common Ground. 2. Institutional differences. 3.Theoretical expectations. 4. Conclusion.
COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: MARKET-TYPE INSTRUMENTS IN INDUSTRIALIZED CAPITALIST COUNTRIES.
LOTSPEICH, RICHARD
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1998, pág. 85
1. Theory of market instruments. a) Command versus market. b) Variants of market instruments. 2. Practices in five OECD countries. a) France. b) Germany. c) Japan. d) The Netherlands. e) United States. 3. Practice versus theory. a) Politics of environmental regulation. b) Cost-effectiveness of command-and-control. 4. Conclusions. 5. Notes.
COMPARING THREE LENSES OF POLICY CHOICE
ZAHARIADIS, NIKOLAOS
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 3/1998, pág. 434
1. Allison and the evaluation of alternativelenses. 2. Illuminating the elements of each framework. a) Units and levels of analysis. b) Three views of collective choice. c) Institutions and procedural rationality. 3. Prediction versus description. 2. Charting a future research agenda.
DEBATING THE DEBATE: LESSONS FROM THE POLICY ANALYSIS OF HEALTH CARE REFORM
FREEDMAN, GRACE R.
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, n.º 1/1996, pág. 149